Pat's Pottery on thu 15 nov 07
There is an article in the new Nov issue of Clay Times giving a recipe for a
"Salvation Glaze" by Tim Eberhardt. He does not give any contact info. It
is for a cone 10 but he says it will also work for cone 6 with the addition
of a few ingredients to drop the melting point. I would love to try this
glaze, but fire at cone 5/6. Can anyone help me with the added ingredients?
Salvation Glaze cone 10 oxidation or reduction
custer feldspar 27%
gerstley borate 12%
dolomite 8.8%
talc 19%
om4 7.5%
silica 25.2 %
************************************
Pat Parker's Stoneware Pottery
Web Site: http://www.stonewarepottery.net/
Email address: Pat@stonewarepottery.net
***********************************
Ron Roy on mon 19 nov 07
Hi Pat,
Not a very good glaze to start with - way short of alumina so it's not
going to be durable - best not to use it as a liner. Because it's short of
alumina it may be runny.
To make it melt better for cone 6 just add more GB 2% at a time - the
durability will get a little worse but not much.
The expansion is a bit on the low side so adding a low expansing material
like superpax could be risky.
There are lots of better glazes around - what does "salvation" mean?
RR
>There is an article in the new Nov issue of Clay Times giving a recipe for a
>"Salvation Glaze" by Tim Eberhardt. He does not give any contact info. It
>is for a cone 10 but he says it will also work for cone 6 with the addition
>of a few ingredients to drop the melting point. I would love to try this
>glaze, but fire at cone 5/6. Can anyone help me with the added ingredients?
>
>Salvation Glaze cone 10 oxidation or reduction
>custer feldspar 27%
>gerstley borate 12%
>dolomite 8.8%
>talc 19%
>om4 7.5%
>silica 25.2 %
>************************************
>Pat Parker's Stoneware Pottery
Ron Roy
RR#4
15084 Little Lake Road
Brighton, Ontario
Canada
K0K 1H0
Pat's Pottery on mon 19 nov 07
Thanks Ron,
It was in the new Nov issue of Clay Times as a "Salvation Glaze" to put =
over=20
glazes that you hate and can't fix. He says it never fails him. Other=20
clayart members have told me to replace the Custer with Nepheline =
Syenite.=20
Which do you think would work better at cone 5/6 ?
Pat
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Ron Roy"
To:
Cc: "Pat's Pottery"
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: Salvation Glaze
> Hi Pat,
>
> Not a very good glaze to start with - way short of alumina so it's =
not
> going to be durable - best not to use it as a liner. Because it's =
short of
> alumina it may be runny.
>
> To make it melt better for cone 6 just add more GB 2% at a time - the
> durability will get a little worse but not much.
>
> The expansion is a bit on the low side so adding a low expansing =
material
> like superpax could be risky.
>
> There are lots of better glazes around - what does "salvation" mean?
>
> RR
>
>
>
>>There is an article in the new Nov issue of Clay Times giving a recipe =
for=20
>>a
>>"Salvation Glaze" by Tim Eberhardt. He does not give any contact =
info.=20
>>It
>>is for a cone 10 but he says it will also work for cone 6 with the=20
>>addition
>>of a few ingredients to drop the melting point. I would love to try =
this
>>glaze, but fire at cone 5/6. Can anyone help me with the added=20
>>ingredients?
>>
>>Salvation Glaze cone 10 oxidation or reduction
>>custer feldspar 27%
>>gerstley borate 12%
>>dolomite 8.8%
>>talc 19%
>>om4 7.5%
>>silica 25.2 %
>>************************************
>>Pat Parker's Stoneware Pottery
>
> Ron Roy
> RR#4
> 15084 Little Lake Road
> Brighton, Ontario
> Canada
> K0K 1H0
>
>=20
claystevslat on tue 20 nov 07
Ron, Pat --
I also saw the article in Clay Times and was
interested in the idea -- a 'salvation' treatment
for work that comes through the glaze fire with
less-than-satisfactory results.
I think that in this case, though, there's less
to the glaze than initially meets the eye.
We do not know what glazes Eberhart uses the
salvation treatment with, but the salvation glaze
is out of whack for a glaze -- as Ron points out,
very low alumina, very low expansion. Given that
it's rich in Dolomite and Talc, it's also unusually
high in magnesium. I'd also point out that given
the Si:Al ratio, it's in the range of some of the
extremely runny crystalline glazes that our
friends, the crystalliers, use.
So here's my speculation -- Eberhardt makes nice
pots, decorates with realistic 'painted' glaze
decoration, and some of the few of his pots I've
seen pictres of appear to have mostly ^10 oxidation
glazes of the feldspar-based variety.
If results are not sufficiently interesting, Eberhardt
applies the salvation glaze and refires. Because
the salvation glaze is magnesium rich, low in
alumina and high in silica, it will react with
the underlying glaze and not just provide a new
layer of effects (granted, a refiring with a second
coat of glaze always does this to some extent).
The effects will include new color effects -- because
magnesium-rich glazes often have different color
effects from Na/K based glazes -- and provide a more
varied effect as the lower levels of the glaze
surface will include mostly the original coloration
and the top layer, rich in Mg, will include the other
coloration, and there may be crystalline effects
because of the extremely high Si:Al ratio of the
salvation treatment, and there may be internal
refraction because of the difference in glass
characteristics between the already-established
normal flux/silica-ratio glass on the pot's surface
vs the extra-high ratio salvation surface lying on
top of it.
This, though, leads to the question -- why does
this glaze work at all? Why doesn't it run off
the pot? It's high in fluxes, low in alumina, and
by rights it should be runny.
My guess here is that Eberhardt mixes it much as
he mixes his regular glaze, and then brushes or
dips a much thinner layer of the salvation onto the
already glazed pot than he would use if it were a
base glaze (which is easy enough -- it's tough to
put a thick layer over a glazed surface).
This thin layer when fired is sufficient to create
effects but not so thick as to run all over.
It's probably worth mixing a small bath of
the salvation glaze up just to see if it will
vitrify at ^6 as it stands. With 68% Si and
total fluxes + Boron at around 26% I wouldn't
doubt that it'll melt.
-- Steve Slatin
with silica
--- In clayart@yahoogroups.com, Ron Roy wrote:
>
> Hi Pat,
>
> Not a very good glaze to start with - way short of alumina so it's
not
> going to be durable - best not to use it as a liner. Because it's
short of
> alumina it may be runny.
>
> To make it melt better for cone 6 just add more GB 2% at a time -
the
> durability will get a little worse but not much.
>
> The expansion is a bit on the low side so adding a low expansing
material
> like superpax could be risky.
>
> There are lots of better glazes around - what does "salvation" mean?
>
> RR
joyce on tue 20 nov 07
ok
At 07:29 PM 11/19/2007, you wrote:
>Ron, Pat --
>
>I also saw the article in Clay Times and was
>interested in the idea -- a 'salvation' treatment
>for work that comes through the glaze fire with
>less-than-satisfactory results.
>
>I think that in this case, though, there's less
>to the glaze than initially meets the eye.
>
>We do not know what glazes Eberhart uses the
>salvation treatment with, but the salvation glaze
>is out of whack for a glaze -- as Ron points out,
>very low alumina, very low expansion. Given that
>it's rich in Dolomite and Talc, it's also unusually
>high in magnesium. I'd also point out that given
>the Si:Al ratio, it's in the range of some of the
>extremely runny crystalline glazes that our
>friends, the crystalliers, use.
>
>So here's my speculation -- Eberhardt makes nice
>pots, decorates with realistic 'painted' glaze
>decoration, and some of the few of his pots I've
>seen pictres of appear to have mostly ^10 oxidation
>glazes of the feldspar-based variety.
>
>If results are not sufficiently interesting, Eberhardt
>applies the salvation glaze and refires. Because
>the salvation glaze is magnesium rich, low in
>alumina and high in silica, it will react with
>the underlying glaze and not just provide a new
>layer of effects (granted, a refiring with a second
>coat of glaze always does this to some extent).
>
>The effects will include new color effects -- because
>magnesium-rich glazes often have different color
>effects from Na/K based glazes -- and provide a more
>varied effect as the lower levels of the glaze
>surface will include mostly the original coloration
>and the top layer, rich in Mg, will include the other
>coloration, and there may be crystalline effects
>because of the extremely high Si:Al ratio of the
>salvation treatment, and there may be internal
>refraction because of the difference in glass
>characteristics between the already-established
>normal flux/silica-ratio glass on the pot's surface
>vs the extra-high ratio salvation surface lying on
>top of it.
>
>This, though, leads to the question -- why does
>this glaze work at all? Why doesn't it run off
>the pot? It's high in fluxes, low in alumina, and
>by rights it should be runny.
>
>My guess here is that Eberhardt mixes it much as
>he mixes his regular glaze, and then brushes or
>dips a much thinner layer of the salvation onto the
>already glazed pot than he would use if it were a
>base glaze (which is easy enough -- it's tough to
>put a thick layer over a glazed surface).
>
>This thin layer when fired is sufficient to create
>effects but not so thick as to run all over.
>
>It's probably worth mixing a small bath of
>the salvation glaze up just to see if it will
>vitrify at ^6 as it stands. With 68% Si and
>total fluxes + Boron at around 26% I wouldn't
>doubt that it'll melt.
>
>-- Steve Slatin
>with silica
>
>
>
>--- In clayart@yahoogroups.com, Ron Roy wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pat,
> >
> > Not a very good glaze to start with - way short of alumina so it's
>not
> > going to be durable - best not to use it as a liner. Because it's
>short of
> > alumina it may be runny.
> >
> > To make it melt better for cone 6 just add more GB 2% at a time -
>the
> > durability will get a little worse but not much.
> >
> > The expansion is a bit on the low side so adding a low expansing
>material
> > like superpax could be risky.
> >
> > There are lots of better glazes around - what does "salvation" mean?
> >
> > RR
>
>______________________________________________________________________________
>Clayart members may send postings to: clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
>
>You may look at the archives for the list, post messages, or change your
>subscription settings here: http://www.acers.org/cic/clayart/
>
>Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at melpots2@visi.com
Mildred Herot on wed 19 dec 07
In the current issue of Clay Times there is a glaze listed by Tim =
Eberhardt which he calls his "Salvation Glaze". Since I'm always =
looking for salvation (In any form) I am most interested in trying this. =
Unfortunately (for me) this is a Cone 10 and I fire to Cone 6. He =
states that he has used this at Cone 6 with the addition of a few =
ingrediants but does not list them anywhere in the article - a most =
frustrating thing for me. Since I am mathmatically impaired I must ask =
the "mavens" of Clay Art to help me out of my delimma. The recipie =
reads as follows:
Custer Feldspar 27%
Gerstley Borate 12.0
Dolomite 8.8
Talc 19.5
OM4 (Ball Clay) 7.5
Silica 25.2
For purple - add 0.5% cobalt carb. and 3% manganese
for blue - just add 2 or 3% cobalt carb
Any help will be most appreciated......Mildred Herot
Pat's Pottery on thu 20 dec 07
Hi Mildred,
I asked the list the same question about a month ago. Someone sent me =
Tim's WebPage and I emailed him the same question. Below is his answer. =
He also sent some photos of the test tiles with both 10 and 6 fireing, =
but I cannot post them here. I haven't had the chance to try it yet, =
but if you do before I do, please post your results:>)
Pat
************************************
Pat Parker's Stoneware Pottery
Web Site: http://www.stonewarepottery.net/
Email address: Pat@stonewarepottery.net
***********************************
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Tim Eberhardt=20
To: undisclosed-recipients:=20
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:39 AM
Subject: Salvation
<
I have a?formula for Salvation Cone 6.? Below are both the Cone 10 and =
Cone 6 formulas.? I am also attaching a photo so you will know what to =
expect- hopefully!??
I am also attaching a photo of a pot where I have used only Salvation as =
the base glaze.? I have used it as a base and as a Salvation for 5 years =
with no problems.? ?Take the cobalt out and you get a satiny white glaze =
that you can add stains and oxides to in order to get a?palette of =
colors.??Is it food-safe?? Do your own research.?
The Cone 10 formula is:
--------------------------
Custer Feldspar? 27
Gerstley Borate 12
Dolomite? ? ?8.8
Talc? 19.5
OM4? 7.5
Silica? 25.2
Add cobalt Carbonate 3%? (variable, but I like 3 the best.)
--------------------------
The Cone 6 formula is the same EXPECT I bumped the Gerstley Borate to 21 =
parts instead of the 12 in the Cone 10 formula.??
Custer Feldspar? 27
Gerstley Borate 21
Dolomite? 8.8
Talc? 19.5
OM4? 7.5
Silica? 25.2
Cobalt Carbonate 3
---------------------------
Note this about the glaze.? The hotter you fire the less it will have =
the "crystaly" look and the bluer the glaze will become.? The cooler, =
the more purple and pink you will see.? If you use this over previously =
fired pieces, what is underneath will affect the outcome somewhat.? I =
spray a couple of coats over pots I think require Salvation.? It always =
works miracles.? I would appreciate hearing from you when you give it a =
try.>>
<Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:15:31 -0500
From: Mildred Herot
In the current issue of Clay Times there is a glaze listed by Tim =3D
Eberhardt which he calls his "Salvation Glaze". Since I'm always =3D
looking for salvation (In any form) I am most interested in trying this. =
=3D
Unfortunately (for me) this is a Cone 10 and I fire to Cone 6. He =
=3D
states that he has used this at Cone 6 with the addition of a few =3D
ingrediants but does not list them anywhere in the article - a most =3D
frustrating thing for me. Since I am mathmatically impaired I must ask =
=3D
the "mavens" of Clay Art to help me out of my delimma. The recipie =3D
reads as follows:
Custer Feldspar 27%
Gerstley Borate 12.0
Dolomite 8.8
Talc 19.5
OM4 (Ball Clay) 7.5
Silica 25.2
For purple - add 0.5% cobalt carb. and 3% manganese
for blue - just add 2 or 3% cobalt carb
Any help will be most appreciated......Mildred Herot>>
Ron Roy on thu 27 dec 07
Hi Mildred,
This may work - just mix up 500 grams and give it a try - let me know if it
works or if it needs some adjusting.
Salvation revised for cone 6 - RR (not durable)
-----------------
F3134............... 23.00 23.00%
TALC................ 29.00 29.00%
NEPH SY............. 10.00 10.00%
OM-4................ 17.00 17.00%
SILICA.............. 21.00 21.00%
----------
100.00
The expansion is low so I don't advise adding opacifiers like zirconium
silicat - or more silica. It's probably not a durable glaze so I would
advise not using it as a liner glaze.
>In the current issue of Clay Times there is a glaze listed by Tim
>Eberhardt which he calls his "Salvation Glaze". Since I'm always looking
>for salvation (In any form) I am most interested in trying this.
>Unfortunately (for me) this is a Cone 10 and I fire to Cone 6. He
>states that he has used this at Cone 6 with the addition of a few
>ingrediants but does not list them anywhere in the article - a most
>frustrating thing for me. Since I am mathmatically impaired I must ask
>the "mavens" of Clay Art to help me out of my delimma. The recipie reads
>as follows:
>
> Custer Feldspar 27%
> Gerstley Borate 12.0
> Dolomite 8.8
> Talc 19.5
> OM4 (Ball Clay) 7.5
> Silica 25.2
>
> For purple - add 0.5% cobalt carb. and 3% manganese
> for blue - just add 2 or 3% cobalt carb
>
>Any help will be most appreciated......Mildred Herot
Ron Roy
RR#4
15084 Little Lake Road
Brighton, Ontario
Canada
K0K 1H0
Dolita Dohrman on tue 1 apr 08
I have been hanging onto this recipe since it appeared on Clayart and
finally gave it a try last week. Mixed it up just as it appears
below. First time I fired it I got an opaque white with a very stony
appearance. Realized by the cones that I had fired to ^5 (not
something I normally do) so I refired the test tile again to ^6. Same
results. I use a slow fire (12 hours to peak) and a slow cool (7
hours to 1400). Is this what is expected? It looks underfired to
me. However, it could also be a glaze that likes to be fired fast.
Anyone else test this? Ron, I can send you a pic if you like.
Dolita
On Dec 27, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Ron Roy wrote:
> Hi Mildred,
>
> This may work - just mix up 500 grams and give it a try - let me
> know if it
> works or if it needs some adjusting.
>
> Salvation revised for cone 6 - RR (not durable)
> -----------------
> F3134............... 23.00 23.00%
> TALC................ 29.00 29.00%
> NEPH SY............. 10.00 10.00%
> OM-4................ 17.00 17.00%
> SILICA.............. 21.00 21.00%
> ----------
> 100.00
>
> The expansion is low so I don't advise adding opacifiers like
> zirconium
> silicat - or more silica. It's probably not a durable glaze so I would
> advise not using it as a liner glaze.
>
>
>
>
>>
Steve Slatin on tue 1 apr 08
Dolita --
The 'Salvation' glaze is a funny beast, lots of what we
call fluxes, but mostly it's calcium and magnesium. there's
less than 3.5% alkalis, and under 5% boron. These are
the powerful melters in the mix, and together there's just
not enough to do much at ^6. Sitting on top of another
glaze, though, especially one that's been melted through
well already, it'll get results.
The eye appeal to Salvation is that it is so magnesium
rich -- it'll give different color response than an alkali
rich glaze alone will.
-- Steve Slatin
Dolita Dohrman wrote:
I have been hanging onto this recipe since it appeared on Clayart and
finally gave it a try last week. Mixed it up just as it appears
below. First time I fired it I got an opaque white with a very stony
appearance. Realized by the cones that I had fired to ^5 (not
something I normally do) so I refired the test tile again to ^6. Same
results. I use a slow fire (12 hours to peak) and a slow cool (7
hours to 1400). Is this what is expected? It looks underfired to
me. However, it could also be a glaze that likes to be fired fast.
Anyone else test this? Ron, I can send you a pic if you like.
Dolita
---------------------------------
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
Ingeborg Foco on tue 1 apr 08
Dolita,
I fired it for fun and it came out fine for me. It is different and I'm not
sure it will become one of my regular glazes but it worked. I fire to ^10
Reduction. It comes out a sort of white/baby blue or navy blue depending on
the glaze you are brushing it over.
Ingeborg
www.thepottersworkshop.com
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Dolita Dohrman
wrote:
> I have been hanging onto this recipe since it appeared on Clayart and
> finally gave it a try last week. Mixed it up just as it appears
> below. First time I fired it I got an opaque white with a very stony
> appearance. Realized by the cones that I had fired to ^5 (not
> something I normally do) so I refired the test tile again to ^6. Same
> results. I use a slow fire (12 hours to peak) and a slow cool (7
> hours to 1400). Is this what is expected? It looks underfired to
> me. However, it could also be a glaze that likes to be fired fast.
> Anyone else test this? Ron, I can send you a pic if you like.
> Dolita
>
> On Dec 27, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Ron Roy wrote:
> > Hi Mildred,
> >
> > This may work - just mix up 500 grams and give it a try - let me
> > know if it
> > works or if it needs some adjusting.
> >
> > Salvation revised for cone 6 - RR (not durable)
> > -----------------
> > F3134............... 23.00 23.00%
> > TALC................ 29.00 29.00%
> > NEPH SY............. 10.00 10.00%
> > OM-4................ 17.00 17.00%
> > SILICA.............. 21.00 21.00%
> > ----------
> > 100.00
> >
> > The expansion is low so I don't advise adding opacifiers like
> > zirconium
> > silicat - or more silica. It's probably not a durable glaze so I would
> > advise not using it as a liner glaze.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
>
>
pam blessinger on wed 2 apr 08
Dolita:
Did you use the glaze over another glaze? Salvation seems to me you
use it go redo a mess. Am i correct?
Thanks for doing the test,and posting the results.
Pam Blessinger
at Clayqueeen @yahoo
Dolita Dohrman wrote:
I have been hanging onto this recipe since it appeared on Clayart and
finally gave it a try last week. Mixed it up just as it appears
below. First time I fired it I got an opaque white with a very stony
appearance. Realized by the cones that I had fired to ^5 (not
something I normally do) so I refired the test tile again to ^6. Same
results. I use a slow fire (12 hours to peak) and a slow cool (7
hours to 1400). Is this what is expected? It looks underfired to
me. However, it could also be a glaze that likes to be fired fast.
Anyone else test this? Ron, I can send you a pic if you like.
Dolita
On Dec 27, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Ron Roy wrote:
> Hi Mildred,
>
> This may work - just mix up 500 grams and give it a try - let me
> know if it
> works or if it needs some adjusting.
>
> Salvation revised for cone 6 - RR (not durable)
> -----------------
> F3134............... 23.00 23.00%
> TALC................ 29.00 29.00%
> NEPH SY............. 10.00 10.00%
> OM-4................ 17.00 17.00%
> SILICA.............. 21.00 21.00%
> ----------
> 100.00
>
> The expansion is low so I don't advise adding opacifiers like
> zirconium
> silicat - or more silica. It's probably not a durable glaze so I would
> advise not using it as a liner glaze.
>
>
>
>
>>
______________________________________________________________________________
Clayart members may send postings to: clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
You may look at the archives for the list, post messages, change your
subscription settings or unsubscribe/leave the list here: http://www.acers.org/cic/clayart/
Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at melpots2@visi.com
---------------------------------
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
Dolita Dohrman on wed 2 apr 08
That will be my next step. I am going to dip a number of test tiles
in some of my other glazes and then dip the tops in Salvation Glaze.
Steve and Ingeborg have indicated this is the way to go also. As
Mildred aptly put it....I am always looking for salvation! Will post
results.
Dolita
On Apr 2, 2008, at 8:22 AM, pam blessinger wrote:
> Dolita:
>
> Did you use the glaze over another glaze? Salvation seems to me you
> use it go redo a mess. Am i correct?
>
>
Mildred on wed 2 apr 08
Hi Dolita: I've used Salvation as a design on a bowl basically done in
Floating Blue and then covered with Cushing satin mat and I rather like it.
I have just put it on a vase and bisqued it and will put Cushing satin mat
over it when I do a Cone 6 firing. I'll let you know how it turns out.
Good luck to us both...Mildred Herot
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dolita Dohrman"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Salvation Glaze
> That will be my next step. I am going to dip a number of test tiles
> in some of my other glazes and then dip the tops in Salvation Glaze.
> Steve and Ingeborg have indicated this is the way to go also. As
> Mildred aptly put it....I am always looking for salvation! Will post
> results.
> Dolita
>
> On Apr 2, 2008, at 8:22 AM, pam blessinger wrote:
>> Dolita:
>>
>> Did you use the glaze over another glaze? Salvation seems to me you
>> use it go redo a mess. Am i correct?
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Clayart members may send postings to: clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
>
> You may look at the archives for the list, post messages, change your
> subscription settings or unsubscribe/leave the list here:
> http://www.acers.org/cic/clayart/
>
> Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at
> melpots2@visi.com
>
Ingeborg Foco on wed 2 apr 08
Dolita,
I had a glaze that just wasn't appealing to the general public and had a
number of pieces glazed with the unappealing glaze. Nothing wrong with it
but it appears to be the wrong color for today. So, I thought what the
heck, what have I to lose. I brushed the "salvation" glaze on it and it
makes for a very interesting glaze, totally different and it isn't like they
are flying off the shelves but then they weren't before either. I had a
sushi set that everyone now "wows" about, hasn't sold but sooner or later it
will. The glaze is totally different depending on the bottom glaze.
Have fun experimenting.
Ingeborg
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Dolita Dohrman
wrote:
> That will be my next step. I am going to dip a number of test tiles
> in some of my other glazes and then dip the tops in Salvation Glaze.
> Steve and Ingeborg have indicated this is the way to go also. As
> Mildred aptly put it....I am always looking for salvation! Will post
> results.
> Dolita
>
> On Apr 2, 2008, at 8:22 AM, pam blessinger wrote:
> > Dolita:
> >
> > Did you use the glaze over another glaze? Salvation seems to me you
> > use it go redo a mess. Am i correct?
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> Clayart members may send postings to: clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
>
> You may look at the archives for the list, post messages, change your
> subscription settings or unsubscribe/leave the list here:
> http://www.acers.org/cic/clayart/
>
> Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at
> melpots2@visi.com
>
--
Sincerely,
Ingeborg
www.thepottersworkshop.com
Patty Rios on thu 3 apr 08
Please don't give up on this glaze! And please post results. This does resurrect ugly glazes. I too have tried it but am still getting milky results, but oh, so much better than the original ugly disaster. Thanks to everyone working on this and sharing info.
PATTY RIOS
Laurie Cowell on thu 3 apr 08
What is the best way to apply the Salvation Glaze? I brushed it on a
warmed pot and found it difficult to cover all areas evenly. If I
dipped into the glaze, should it be thinner than for normal glazing?
Laurie Cowell,
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
|
