search  current discussion  categories  glazes - cone 04-06 

digest number 15053

updated sat 17 mar 12

 

Wes Rolley on fri 16 mar 12


On 3/15/2012 1:59 PM, Kathi Lesueur wrote:
> The easiest fix is to have all "unions" be considered civil unions for
> the purposes of the state and the benefits and responsibilities of
> those unions would apply to all couples After that any church who
> wants to perform a "Marriage" for a couple would be free to do so, or
> not, depending on their beliefs.
Kathi, that is so easy to understand and such common sense that it has
absolutely no chance of ever passing most state legislature, let alone
getting through Washington. But, we should all support it given the
opportunity.