Earl Brunner on fri 10 sep 99
Q: How many clayart subscribers does it take to light a kiln?
A: 1,331:
1 to light the kiln and to post to the mail list that the kiln has been
lit.
14 to share similar experiences of lighting kilns and how the
kiln could have been lit differently.
7 to caution about the dangers of lighting kilns.
27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about lighting kilns
53 to flame the spell checkers.
156 to write to the list administrator complaining about the kiln
lighting
discussion and its inappropriateness to clayart.
41 to correct spelling in the spelling/grammar flames.
109 to post that this list is not about lighting kilns and to please
take
this email exchange to www.kiln.org/light/.
203 to demand that cross posting to other related lists stop
111 to defend the posting to this list saying that we all light kilns
and therefore the posts **are** relevant to this mail list.
306 to debate which method of lighting kilns is superior, where
to buy the best burner system, what brand of burners work best for
this technique, and what brands are faulty.
27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different lighting
techniques
14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly, and to post corrected
URLs.
3 to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to
this
list which makes lighting kilns relevant to this list.
33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote them including all
headers and footers, and then add "Me Too.".
12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing because they cannot
handle the kiln lighting controversy.
19 to quote the "Me Too's" to say, "Me Three.".
4 to suggest that posters request the kiln lighting FAQ.
1 to propose new kiln lighting news group on alternate server
47 to say this is just what alt.physics.cold_fusion was meant for,
leave
it there.
143 votes for www.kiln.org/lit/.
--
Earl Brunner
http://coyote.accessnv.com/bruec
mailto:bruec@anv.net
Juliet Johnston on fri 10 sep 99
and one to whine "Why gas, why not use electric." Thanks for the ear to
ear grin!
Juliet
juljohnston@webtv.net
SCOX on sun 12 sep 99
and this is why i love Clayart. When the heady comments become sooo intense
someone is bound to bring things back to reality. Go Earl!!!
scox@atlantic.net
Earl Brunner wrote:
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> Q: How many clayart subscribers does it take to light a kiln?
>
> A: 1,331:
>
> 1 to light the kiln and to post to the mail list that the kiln has been
> lit.
>
> 14 to share similar experiences of lighting kilns and how the
> kiln could have been lit differently.
>
> 7 to caution about the dangers of lighting kilns.
>
> 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about lighting kilns
>
> 53 to flame the spell checkers.
>
> 156 to write to the list administrator complaining about the kiln
> lighting
> discussion and its inappropriateness to clayart.
>
> 41 to correct spelling in the spelling/grammar flames.
>
> 109 to post that this list is not about lighting kilns and to please
> take
> this email exchange to www.kiln.org/light/.
>
> 203 to demand that cross posting to other related lists stop
>
> 111 to defend the posting to this list saying that we all light kilns
> and therefore the posts **are** relevant to this mail list.
>
> 306 to debate which method of lighting kilns is superior, where
> to buy the best burner system, what brand of burners work best for
> this technique, and what brands are faulty.
>
> 27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different lighting
> techniques
>
> 14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly, and to post corrected
>
> URLs.
>
> 3 to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to
> this
> list which makes lighting kilns relevant to this list.
>
> 33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote them including all
> headers and footers, and then add "Me Too.".
>
> 12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing because they cannot
> handle the kiln lighting controversy.
>
> 19 to quote the "Me Too's" to say, "Me Three.".
>
> 4 to suggest that posters request the kiln lighting FAQ.
>
> 1 to propose new kiln lighting news group on alternate server
>
> 47 to say this is just what alt.physics.cold_fusion was meant for,
> leave
> it there.
>
> 143 votes for www.kiln.org/lit/.
>
> --
> Earl Brunner
> http://coyote.accessnv.com/bruec
> mailto:bruec@anv.net
Earl Brunner on sun 12 sep 99
actually there could be more than one, There are around 2000 clayarters!
I thought about the electric kiln people, but I didn't really make this
thing up, I adapted it from one on lightbulbs.
Juliet Johnston wrote:
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> and one to whine "Why gas, why not use electric." Thanks for the ear to
> ear grin!
>
> Juliet
> juljohnston@webtv.net
--
Earl Brunner
http://coyote.accessnv.com/bruec
mailto:bruec@anv.net
Tom Wirt on sun 12 sep 99
----- Original Message -----
From: Earl Brunner
Subject: lighting kilns
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> Q: How many clayart subscribers does it take to light a kiln?
>
> A: 1,331:
>
Geez Earl.....you forgot the 1224 that then discussed whether lighting a
kiln was an art or a craft!!!!
Tom Wirt
The Brinks on sun 12 sep 99
Hi Earl...I hereby christen you #1332, Official Kiln-lighting Statistician
and Related Oddments Tabulator.
Ann Brink in CA
At 12:33 PM 9/10/99 EDT, you wrote:
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>Q: How many clayart subscribers does it take to light a kiln?
>
> A: 1,331:
>
> 1 to light the kiln and to post to the mail list that the kiln has been
>lit.
>
> 14 to share similar experiences of lighting kilns and how the
> kiln could have been lit differently.
>
> 7 to caution about the dangers of lighting kilns.
>
> 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about lighting kilns
>
> 53 to flame the spell checkers.
>
> 156 to write to the list administrator complaining about the kiln
>lighting
> discussion and its inappropriateness to clayart.
>
> 41 to correct spelling in the spelling/grammar flames.
>
> 109 to post that this list is not about lighting kilns and to please
>take
> this email exchange to www.kiln.org/light/.
>
> 203 to demand that cross posting to other related lists stop
>
> 111 to defend the posting to this list saying that we all light kilns
>and therefore the posts **are** relevant to this mail list.
>
> 306 to debate which method of lighting kilns is superior, where
> to buy the best burner system, what brand of burners work best for
> this technique, and what brands are faulty.
>
> 27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different lighting
>techniques
>
> 14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly, and to post corrected
>
> URLs.
>
> 3 to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to
>this
> list which makes lighting kilns relevant to this list.
>
> 33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote them including all
> headers and footers, and then add "Me Too.".
>
> 12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing because they cannot
> handle the kiln lighting controversy.
>
> 19 to quote the "Me Too's" to say, "Me Three.".
>
> 4 to suggest that posters request the kiln lighting FAQ.
>
> 1 to propose new kiln lighting news group on alternate server
>
> 47 to say this is just what alt.physics.cold_fusion was meant for,
>leave
> it there.
>
> 143 votes for www.kiln.org/lit/.
>
>
>
>--
>Earl Brunner
>http://coyote.accessnv.com/bruec
>mailto:bruec@anv.net
>
>
e-mail billann@impulse.net
Nils Lou on mon 13 sep 99
Actually there are two more you forgot to mention, Earl.
Yourself as the accountant and me--reminding you. NL
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, SCOX wrote:
> ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> and this is why i love Clayart. When the heady comments become sooo intense
> someone is bound to bring things back to reality. Go Earl!!!
> scox@atlantic.net
>
> Earl Brunner wrote:
>
> > ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
> > Q: How many clayart subscribers does it take to light a kiln?
> >
> > A: 1,331:
> >
> > 1 to light the kiln and to post to the mail list that the kiln has been
> > lit.
> >
> > 14 to share similar experiences of lighting kilns and how the
> > kiln could have been lit differently.
> >
> > 7 to caution about the dangers of lighting kilns.
> >
> > 27 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about lighting kilns
> >
> > 53 to flame the spell checkers.
> >
> > 156 to write to the list administrator complaining about the kiln
> > lighting
> > discussion and its inappropriateness to clayart.
> >
> > 41 to correct spelling in the spelling/grammar flames.
> >
> > 109 to post that this list is not about lighting kilns and to please
> > take
> > this email exchange to www.kiln.org/light/.
> >
> > 203 to demand that cross posting to other related lists stop
> >
> > 111 to defend the posting to this list saying that we all light kilns
> > and therefore the posts **are** relevant to this mail list.
> >
> > 306 to debate which method of lighting kilns is superior, where
> > to buy the best burner system, what brand of burners work best for
> > this technique, and what brands are faulty.
> >
> > 27 to post URLs where one can see examples of different lighting
> > techniques
> >
> > 14 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly, and to post corrected
> >
> > URLs.
> >
> > 3 to post about links they found from the URLs that are relevant to
> > this
> > list which makes lighting kilns relevant to this list.
> >
> > 33 to concatenate all posts to date, then quote them including all
> > headers and footers, and then add "Me Too.".
> >
> > 12 to post to the list that they are unsubscribing because they cannot
> > handle the kiln lighting controversy.
> >
> > 19 to quote the "Me Too's" to say, "Me Three.".
> >
> > 4 to suggest that posters request the kiln lighting FAQ.
> >
> > 1 to propose new kiln lighting news group on alternate server
> >
> > 47 to say this is just what alt.physics.cold_fusion was meant for,
> > leave
> > it there.
> >
> > 143 votes for www.kiln.org/lit/.
> >
> > --
> > Earl Brunner
> > http://coyote.accessnv.com/bruec
> > mailto:bruec@anv.net
>
Steve Dalton on mon 13 sep 99
I think another to complain about the dangers of electricity.
and 2 to ask if the power bill has been paid.
Steve Dalton
| |
|
