search  current discussion  categories  techniques - cracking 

s-shaped cracks and magnetism

updated fri 2 jun 00

 

priddy on thu 1 jun 00


you aren't accounting for the micro-magnetism generated by the spinning
and the water's polarity. It can make things "line up" in non mechanical=

ways, on a chemical level, far deeper than your thumb...polarization and
magnetism may be your missing link in gettin this concept.

On a molecular level, it is a significant force.

EP, ala big-science brained husband again, he still could be wrong...but =

I think he has one here.

iandol wrote:
> Subject: s-shaped cracks update
> =

> I suppose every one who throws clay for a prolonged period will at some=
=3D
> time or other run into the problem of S-cracks. Perhaps Rhonda Oldland =
=3D
> would give more information about the clay primer from which she quotes=
=3D
> to describe a way of tensioning the base of a pot. The term Tension is =
a =3D
> change from Compress. I know about the technique she describes but have=
=3D
> always found that when I apply the sort of pressure which I discern is =
=3D
> needed I finish up with my finger or thumb going through the clay to th=
e =3D
> wheelhead if I move from the centre to the inner base of the wall.=3D20=

> =

> There is another thing which continues to concern me. It is description=
s =3D
> of the way clay particles align themselves as parallel sheets in =3D
> response to pressure. Although there are idealised diagrams in several =
=3D
> books which show this, not one author has come forward with =3D
> photomicrographs of unfired pots which clearly illustrate that this =3D=

> happens as a fact. Therefore I tend to consider their information to be=
=3D
> assumption, conjecture or imaginative.
> =

> Like Rhonda, I have an open mind on the matter, until better evidence i=
s =3D
> presented. But having said that, I find it difficult to accept that =3D=

> platelets of clay in any clay body (which may have more than forty =3D
> percent non plastics whose particle size is two or three orders of =3D
> magnitude greater, that is a hundred to one thousand times the size of =
=3D
> clay particles) are going to respond to pressure from a thumb which has=
=3D
> an area a million times larger that that of the majority of clay =3D
> crystals.
> =

> Should anyone wish to take this discussion further I would be pleased =3D=

> hear what they have to say.
> =

> Ivor Lewis. Often doing things in a contrary way to gain understanding.=

> =

>
_________________________________________________________________________=
_____
> Send postings to clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
> =

> You may look at the archives for the list or change your subscription
> settings from http://www.ceramics.org/clayart/
> =

> Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at
melpots@pclink.com.


respectfully submitted,
elizabeth priddy

priddy-clay@usa.net
http:www.angelfire.com/nc/clayworkshop

____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D=
1