george koller on mon 11 sep 00
> iandol wrote:
>
> > > >
Iandol, others....
Do the experts that use drawings take the time to do a 3d sketch when the
pot is to be symmetrical? I would think just the outside curve would define
the essence of the pot, and the rest, in the wheel world, is unnecessary?
Since the posting on 3D I have been thinking about what the computer could
really do to help potters in the "artfulness of the shape of pot" category. I
suppose seeing a "wire mesh" view from just a half-section of the 3d object
would be a thrill, and perhaps aid somewhat in visualizing, but perhaps the
bigger assistance could come from an other directions....
Here are some ideas I have had that seem related:
1. From profiles of particularly artful, or classical shapes a study could
be done of what they have in common, if anything.
2. Once a series of curves and transitions are defined then the computer
could produce exactly proportioned curves for any given total
length (height).
3. Mold making. Shrinkage factors and so on.
4. Cataloging, communicating about, and exploring shapes based on
"decoded" profiles. Hmmmm - the gnome project for pots?
A meeting ground for the two sides of our brain? A sacrilege, or
the key to a next step of understanding?
I wonder if any authors, instructors have attempted to break down the
basic shapes?
Whatever the answers, I find this fascinating!
Best,
George Koller
Sturgeon Bay, Wi - Door County
| |
|
