Don & June MacDonald on sat 7 oct 00
The article in Ceramics Monthly by Rick Malmgren discussing Cone 6
reduction is great! Two years ago, I had our Art Center change to Cone
6 reduction for all of the reasons Rick tells about in his article. I
also found that the shinos, temokus, celadons etc. looked just the same
as Cone 10. It does save money on fuel, refractories, etc. I would
like to discuss a few ponts with Rick, if he is on the list, or if
anyone knows his email address, could they please forward it to me?
Thanks..........June from B.C.
chappelear on mon 9 oct 00
Rick can be reached at rmalmgren@aol.com.
-----Original Message-----
From: Don & June MacDonald
To: CLAYART@LSV.CERAMICS.ORG
Date: Sunday, October 08, 2000 8:26 AM
Subject: Rick Malmgren - Cone 6 Reduction
>The article in Ceramics Monthly by Rick Malmgren discussing Cone 6
>reduction is great! Two years ago, I had our Art Center change to Cone
>6 reduction for all of the reasons Rick tells about in his article. I
>also found that the shinos, temokus, celadons etc. looked just the same
>as Cone 10. It does save money on fuel, refractories, etc. I would
>like to discuss a few ponts with Rick, if he is on the list, or if
>anyone knows his email address, could they please forward it to me?
>Thanks..........June from B.C.
>
>___________________________________________________________________________
___
>Send postings to clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
>
>You may look at the archives for the list or change your subscription
>settings from http://www.ceramics.org/clayart/
>
>Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at
melpots@pclink.com.
| |
|
