artimater on fri 30 mar 01
Yeah I think I would have sided with the nice tits(could I get a =
definition)....But really I'm just a fool for a pretty face and long =
legs.....Guess this type of form might be subjective also huh?
"Science is what you know, Philosophy is what you don't know" -Bertrand =
Russell
-artimator
"I only indulge when I've seen a snake, so I keep a supply of =
indulgences and snakes handy"
http://www.geocities.com/artimator/index.html
iandol on tue 3 apr 01
Dear Vince Pitelka,
I whole heartedly endorse your position on this topic as stated in your =
post.
One point which I think has been missing from this debate is an =
exploration of the term "Form" My own view is that it comprises the =
entirety of the elements which contribute to a work, and in the case of =
three dimensional objects, perhaps even the space which surrounds or =
penetrates them.
So far, discussion seems to be limited to "Shape" and "Surface". When =
the other elements are brought into the vision of clay artists and =
exploited then your view <"And just to knock around an old but not dead =
issue, the human race is just barely beginning to explore pottery form. =
The possibilities are unlimited."> may be realised.
Thank you for your well reasoned contribution.
Best regards,
Ivor Lewis, Redhill, South Australia
| |
|
