search  current discussion  categories  books & magazines - books 

: another book in the offing!

updated mon 24 sep 01

 

iandol on fri 21 sep 01


Dear Steve Mills and Mike Bailey,

Being about reduction firings, no doubt the popular chemistry may be =
reiterated without criticism. So I have only two suggestions.

Perhaps it is time for research relating Oxyprobe readings to the =
quantity or partial pressure of oxygen present in a kiln's atmosphere to =
be presented so that we may make better use of the Ellingham Diagram.=20

The second point which needs to be opened up follows on from the =
comments of Kingery et al relating to the meaning of the term =
"Reduction" and the alternative ways we can cause this process to =
happen. We need some way of assessing carbon and carbon monoxide if we =
are to invoke those substances as the cause of, rather than accessories =
to reduction processes.

If these issues are not addressed I feel (no offence meant by this to =
someone brave enough to author a new volume on such a well trod topic) =
that this will just be another collection of "show and tell statements".

Best regards,

Ivor Lewis. Redhill, South Australia=20

Steve Mills on sun 23 sep 01


Dear Ivor,

Thank you for taking the lid off another topic which, if I am any Judge,
should run and run, and with a bit of luck provide Mike with the bones
of ANOTHER chapter (if not a whole book) on a subject with as many
opinions as there are grains of sand (or glazes) in this world. :-)

Steve
Rubbing his hands with glee in:
Bath
UK


In message , iandol writes
>Dear Steve Mills and Mike Bailey,
>
>Being about reduction firings, no doubt the popular chemistry may be =3D
>reiterated without criticism. So I have only two suggestions.
>
>Perhaps it is time for research relating Oxyprobe readings to the =3D
>quantity or partial pressure of oxygen present in a kiln's atmosphere to =
>=3D
>be presented so that we may make better use of the Ellingham Diagram.=3D2=
>0
>
>The second point which needs to be opened up follows on from the =3D
>comments of Kingery et al relating to the meaning of the term =3D
>"Reduction" and the alternative ways we can cause this process to =3D
>happen. We need some way of assessing carbon and carbon monoxide if we =3D
>are to invoke those substances as the cause of, rather than accessories =3D
>to reduction processes.
>
>If these issues are not addressed I feel (no offence meant by this to =3D
>someone brave enough to author a new volume on such a well trod topic) =3D
>that this will just be another collection of "show and tell statements".
>
>Best regards,
>
>Ivor Lewis. Redhill, South Australia=3D20

--
Steve Mills
Bath
UK