iandol on mon 23 sep 02
Dear John Baymore,
Based on your own extensive knowledge, your supposition may well be =
correct in certain circumstances. But the Peterson quote seems by way of =
a blanket statement. It is a separate paragraph.=20
As I said to Martin, her reasons for making the statement may be =
contained in her references, which are extensive.
Best regards,
Ivor
| |
|