search  current discussion  categories  tools & equipment - ball mills 

pot mill vs. ball mill

updated wed 26 nov 03

 

Mike Martino on tue 25 nov 03


Heh, heh, actually he got a laugh out of that when I explained what 'pot
mill' would mean in English if it was logically constructed after 'ball
mill'. He didn't know why the distinction came into being either, I had
wondered if this was perhaps an older expression in British English or
perhaps a direct translation from another language, such as German? I know
of at least one German who was very inflluential in the Arita area in
improving glaze technology, can't recall his name right now.

Mike
in Taku, Japan






-----Original Message-----
From: Clayart [mailto:CLAYART@LSV.CERAMICS.ORG]On Behalf Of
pdp1@EARTHLINK.NET
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:02 AM
To: CLAYART@LSV.CERAMICS.ORG
Subject: Re: Pot mill vs. Ball Mill, Was RE: yellow ochre and a a bit of
titanium PART I


What does he do, put 'Pots' in it and let 'em tumble around
a few ten-thousand times?


Phil
Las Vegas


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Martino"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 12:31 AM
Subject: Pot mill vs. Ball Mill, Was RE: yellow ochre and a
a bit of titanium PART I


> What a coincidence, I just found out what this was the
other day. Something
> of a letdown I have to confess. Potmill and ballmill are
the same thing. A
> ball mill is a big version of a pot mill. Or maybe a pot
mill is a small
> version of a ball mill. Anyway, I saw a small ball mill in
my friend's
> studio and asked him if he used his ball mill often. He
said "I don't have a
> ball mill", I said "What's that?", he said "It's a pot
mill."
>
> Mike
>
> in Taku, Japan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clayart [mailto:CLAYART@LSV.CERAMICS.ORG]On Behalf
Of lili krakowski
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 10:30 AM
> To: CLAYART@LSV.CERAMICS.ORG
> Subject: yellow ochre and a a bit of titanium PART I
>
>
> Sam asked about yellow ochre the other day and there were
answers, but
> little more.
>
> Ochre is a wonderful material, and interesting to use.
>
> It seems to me far more plastic than iron oxides, maybe
because it is less
> refined. It is great in slips.
>
> I use Cooper's Black Slip which contains it.
>
> Red Clay 60
> Yellow Ochre 30
> Red Iron Oxide 10
>
> Leach writes:
>
> "Ochres, siennas and umbers are all natural earths
containing from about 5
> per cent. to 12 per cent. of iron. Some are highly platic
and may be used
> for colouring bodies or as slips. Calcined they are often
useful in
> stoneware glazes, especially celadons."
>
> And Leach tells that the St Ives Red Slip is "Pure local
raw ochre."
>
> He has 3 ochre using glazes.
>
> "Leach's Korean Type:
>
> Feldspar 25
> Limestone 25
> China clay 6.5
> Pike's clay 20
> Quartz 20
> Calcined ochre 2
> Red Iron Oxide 1.5
>
> This is c.7-9 (I assume Seger?) Amber in oxidation and
Quiet Grey-green
> in reduction
>
> Hamada's Lung Ch'uan Celadon
>
> Feldspar 64
> Pine Ash 27
> Calcined Ochre 9
>
> Amber in Oxidation, Heavy dull green in reduction. Bottle
green when hard
> fired. c.6-8
>
> Don' t know what "hard-fired" means. Sorry
>
> Kenzan Celadon
>
> Feldspar 62
> Medium Ash 18
> China Clay 12
> Quartz 2
> Calcined Ochre 6
> Red Iron Ox. .12
>
> NB> the Fe203 is decimal point 12
>
> And amber in oxidation, transparent olive green in
reduction, c.7-9
>
> I am intrigued by the notes: "The ochre, iron, quartz and
any coarse ash
> should be ground in a pot-mill, the alter native is an
opaque mottled effect
> beautiful in itself."
>
> And no idea what a pot-mill is either. From the context,
elsewhere in the
> book, I take it to be a ball mill.
>
> This is getting too long. So tomorrow we do Part II
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
________________
> __
> Send postings to clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
>
> You may look at the archives for the list or change your
subscription
> settings from http://www.ceramics.org/clayart/
>
> Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached
at
> melpots@pclink.com.
>
>
____________________________________________________________
__________________
> Send postings to clayart@lsv.ceramics.org
>
> You may look at the archives for the list or change your
subscription
> settings from http://www.ceramics.org/clayart/
>
> Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached
at melpots@pclink.com.

____________________________________________________________________________
__
Send postings to clayart@lsv.ceramics.org

You may look at the archives for the list or change your subscription
settings from http://www.ceramics.org/clayart/

Moderator of the list is Mel Jacobson who may be reached at
melpots@pclink.com.

Logan Oplinger on tue 25 nov 03


On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:31:02 +0900, Mike Martino
wrote:

>What a coincidence, I just found out what this was the other day. Something
>of a letdown I have to confess. Potmill and ballmill are the same thing. A
>ball mill is a big version of a pot mill. Or maybe a pot mill is a small
>version of a ball mill. Anyway, I saw a small ball mill in my friend's
>studio and asked him if he used his ball mill often. He said "I don't have
a
>ball mill", I said "What's that?", he said "It's a pot mill."
>
>Mike
>
>in Taku, Japan

Hello List,

So, I went to Google, typed in "pot mill" to search, and came up with a
myriad of references. My favorite:

http://www.gootdenki.com/epage1.htm

Click on the Potter's Wheel button and scroll down to where it says

"Electric potter's wheel, TP-5" and read the "Feature:" line.

I could have swooned! This is the wheel for me!

Then scroll further down to "Desk-top electric potter's wheel, RAKURAKU-2"
and read the "Feature:" line again. (WARNING: THIS IS NOT TO BE READ BY
THOSE WHO ARE OVERLY SENSITIVE TO AGE/GENDER BIASED REFERENCES!) &:^D

Logan Oplinger
Another Tropical Island