search  current discussion  categories  safety - health 

learning styles was "rule of 3 teaching" - candace's mentions

updated thu 27 jul 06

 

Steve Slatin on tue 25 jul 06


Phil --

It was like the Kuder preference profile from our youth --
"Quick, which would you prefer -- to throw the ball,
swing the bat, or chase the fly?" No room for
the possibility that you'd like to pitch but know
you hit better, or would prefer to be the ump, or
don't care and would rather juggle tennis balls, or
read sci fi.

No need to wish ill of the authors, though. Those
poor folks suffer sufficiently from their lack of
imagination.

-- Steve S




pdp1@EARTHLINK.NET wrote:
The structure OF the questions are implicit
indicators, insideously coercive, and by the time
almost any child has already been processed to
that point, even qiasi-hypnotic...as 'indicators'
of where one is being told TO 'be', in order for
these 'choices' to have any secondary compromise
for construence other than being exhasperating
impositions and mind f*cking gambits.


I took the 'test' in effect, and savored each
question, even if not with the same innocent
vividness and outrage I may have had say at 12 or
15 ( where I would gladly have set the trash cans
on fire on my way "out") , but still, with enough
intact sense to wish someone would calmly,
compassionately, and decidedly strangle whoever
composed it...if ot fatally, then at least to some
clinically profound anoxia with a nasty wanging
headache to follow...

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

pdp1@EARTHLINK.NET on tue 25 jul 06


Hi Candace,


The questionaire your Link goes to...

IS 'interesting, of for me, tragically and
sadly...


Reminds me so much of "why" I hated school unto
the verymost nucleus of every cell of my body...


The structure OF the questions are implicit
indicators, insideously coercive, and by the time
almost any child has already been processed to
that point, even qiasi-hypnotic...as 'indicators'
of where one is being told TO 'be', in order for
these 'choices' to have any secondary compromise
for construence other than being exhasperating
impositions and mind f*cking gambits.


I took the 'test' in effect, and savored each
question, even if not with the same innocent
vividness and outrage I may have had say at 12 or
15 ( where I would gladly have set the trash cans
on fire on my way "out") , but still, with enough
intact sense to wish someone would calmly,
compassionately, and decidedly strangle whoever
composed it...if ot fatally, then at least to some
clinically profound anoxia with a nasty wanging
headache to follow...


Does anyone else 'see' the 'problem' with, and
intrnsic TO, "these" kinds-of 'tests' or
questionaires?

Does anyone else 'see' what is going on here?



Love,


Phil
Las Vegas



----- Original Message -----
From: "Candace Young"


> Here's a site with a Learning Style quiz
developed at North Carolina State
> U. Its a good way to help students identify
their own learning styles and
> to help plan lessons as an instructor. Good to
know for oneself too. Candace
>
>
http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html
> Candace Young mailto:candace@bayriverpottery.com
>
> Bay River Pottery www.bayriverpottery.com
> 107 S. Water Street, P.O. Box 394
> Bayboro, NC 28515
> 252.745.4749
> Eastern North Carolina